Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1791 - 1800 of 15404 for probate.
Search results 1791 - 1800 of 15404 for probate.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report concluding there is no basis to challenge a judgment of conviction after revocation of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218846 - 2018-09-11
report concluding there is no basis to challenge a judgment of conviction after revocation of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218846 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of probation. Endres’s probation was later revoked, and he was returned to court for sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
years of probation. Endres’s probation was later revoked, and he was returned to court for sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885624 - 2024-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (3) she is entitled to modification of the amount due as a condition of probation under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37597 - 2009-07-13
; and (3) she is entitled to modification of the amount due as a condition of probation under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37597 - 2009-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence and ordered five years of probation. Miller’s probation was later revoked, and he was returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
sentence and ordered five years of probation. Miller’s probation was later revoked, and he was returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey M. Wesoloski
. Additionally, Wesoloski was subject to a consecutive two-year probation term with sixty days in the Monroe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8198 - 2017-09-19
. Additionally, Wesoloski was subject to a consecutive two-year probation term with sixty days in the Monroe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8198 - 2017-09-19
State v. David A. Achenbach
(consecutive to count one), and a nine-month term, stayed, with three years probation on count three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
(consecutive to count one), and a nine-month term, stayed, with three years probation on count three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Babette Davis
the No. 95-1703-CR -2- option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
the No. 95-1703-CR -2- option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
State v. Babette Davis
it failed to consider the option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
it failed to consider the option of probation and because it placed undue emphasis on one sentencing factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and imposed a two-year period of probation. The circuit court initially denied Griffin sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33274 - 2008-07-07
, and imposed a two-year period of probation. The circuit court initially denied Griffin sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33274 - 2008-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
of second-degree sexual assault by a probation officer and five counts of misconduct in public office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18
of second-degree sexual assault by a probation officer and five counts of misconduct in public office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18