Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 30123 for de.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 30123 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against Reed. ¶30 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244176 - 2019-07-25
against Reed. ¶30 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244176 - 2019-07-25
Frontsheet
. Fons and Fons Law Office, Stoughton; Deborah Zuckerman and Michael Schuster, Washington D.C.; De Vonna
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33271 - 2008-06-30
. Fons and Fons Law Office, Stoughton; Deborah Zuckerman and Michael Schuster, Washington D.C.; De Vonna
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33271 - 2008-06-30
State v. Brent R. Reed
probable cause to justify a criminal charge is a legal determination this court reviews de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17932 - 2012-05-30
probable cause to justify a criminal charge is a legal determination this court reviews de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17932 - 2012-05-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
this issue de novo. See State v. Hibl, 2006 WI 52, ¶23, 290 Wis. 2d 595, 714 N.W.2d 194. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33356 - 2014-09-15
this issue de novo. See State v. Hibl, 2006 WI 52, ¶23, 290 Wis. 2d 595, 714 N.W.2d 194. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33356 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a matter of law also reviewed de novo.’” Diamond Assets LLC v. Godina, 2022 WI App 47, ¶14, 404 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666087 - 2023-06-08
is a matter of law also reviewed de novo.’” Diamond Assets LLC v. Godina, 2022 WI App 47, ¶14, 404 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666087 - 2023-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 344, ¶17. ¶9 “[This court] review[s] de novo ‘[w]hether a defendant knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049727 - 2025-12-17
Wis. 2d 344, ¶17. ¶9 “[This court] review[s] de novo ‘[w]hether a defendant knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049727 - 2025-12-17
State v. Sean Smith
constitutional muster is a question of law which we review de novo. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11973 - 2005-03-31
constitutional muster is a question of law which we review de novo. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11973 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court decides de novo. Id. ¶5 Our review of a claim that a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94664 - 2014-09-15
, which this court decides de novo. Id. ¶5 Our review of a claim that a defendant has been denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94664 - 2014-09-15
State v. John B. Young
the facts of record constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4402 - 2005-03-31
the facts of record constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4402 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Torpen
from two unrelated criminal cases is contrary to law presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
from two unrelated criminal cases is contrary to law presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31