Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 29828 for des.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
State v. James A. Torpen
from two unrelated criminal cases is contrary to law presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
from two unrelated criminal cases is contrary to law presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
. Whether a writ of certiorari is misdirected, and thus insufficient, is a question of law inviting our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35568 - 2011-06-14
. Whether a writ of certiorari is misdirected, and thus insufficient, is a question of law inviting our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35568 - 2011-06-14
Re/Max Realty 100 v. Howard Basso, Jr.
676, 643 N.W.2d 132. The construction of a written contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5732 - 2005-03-31
676, 643 N.W.2d 132. The construction of a written contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5732 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman J.
. ¶7 We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5167 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5167 - 2005-03-31
Sauk County v. Aaron J. J.
action to restrict a person’s liberty is a question of constitutional law which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7140 - 2005-03-31
action to restrict a person’s liberty is a question of constitutional law which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7140 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas J. Otto v. Milwaukee County
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting promissory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting promissory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a criminal prosecution is a question of law” which this court reviews de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612601 - 2023-01-24
in a criminal prosecution is a question of law” which this court reviews de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612601 - 2023-01-24
2010 WI APP 67
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49357 - 2011-08-21
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49357 - 2011-08-21