Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 50380 for our.
Search results 17901 - 17910 of 50380 for our.
CA Blank Order
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Todd Weyher appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130174 - 2014-11-20
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Todd Weyher appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130174 - 2014-11-20
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
subpoenaed (or summoned), it is our opinion that a judge does not violate the Rule by voluntarily agreeing
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35543 - 2009-02-09
subpoenaed (or summoned), it is our opinion that a judge does not violate the Rule by voluntarily agreeing
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35543 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP1011-CRNM 2 Upon our initial review of the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888072 - 2024-12-10
. No. 2024AP1011-CRNM 2 Upon our initial review of the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888072 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, P.J., Sherman, and Blanchard, JJ. In response to our orders of December 21, 2015, and January 8
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163456 - 2017-09-21
, P.J., Sherman, and Blanchard, JJ. In response to our orders of December 21, 2015, and January 8
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163456 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
again emphasize that nothing in our prior order or this opinion should be read as indicating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
again emphasize that nothing in our prior order or this opinion should be read as indicating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report addressing potential issues identified in our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264319 - 2020-06-10
a supplemental no-merit report addressing potential issues identified in our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264319 - 2020-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP1011-CRNM 2 Upon our initial review of the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888072 - 2024-12-10
. No. 2024AP1011-CRNM 2 Upon our initial review of the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888072 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
determined that the issue identified by our prior order would have arguable merit, and that Wartzak wishes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611018 - 2023-01-18
determined that the issue identified by our prior order would have arguable merit, and that Wartzak wishes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611018 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a “new factor” that entitles him to resentencing. Based No. 2017AP1577 2 upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213750 - 2018-05-31
a “new factor” that entitles him to resentencing. Based No. 2017AP1577 2 upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213750 - 2018-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Diaz’s petition on the ground that the petition is frivolous. Based upon our review of the briefing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881477 - 2024-11-27
Diaz’s petition on the ground that the petition is frivolous. Based upon our review of the briefing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881477 - 2024-11-27