Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17911 - 17920 of 30123 for de.
Search results 17911 - 17920 of 30123 for de.
County of Green Lake v. Clinton L. Duhm
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6056 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6056 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig D. Warren
findings of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We decide de novo, however, the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17639 - 2005-04-13
findings of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We decide de novo, however, the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17639 - 2005-04-13
State v. Claus Bruestle
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7455 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7455 - 2005-03-31
Robert Potratz v. Stokely Usa, Inc.
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment is appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment is appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 129
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Westphal v. Farmers Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40079 - 2011-02-07
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Westphal v. Farmers Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40079 - 2011-02-07
State v. Philip J. Foster
materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
CA Blank Order
constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98879 - 2013-07-02
constitutes a new factor is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98879 - 2013-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶11 We will independently review whether claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32944 - 2008-06-04
decides de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶11 We will independently review whether claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32944 - 2008-06-04
State v. Odell M. Hardison
and Basting’s trial testimony is de minimis. Under either circumstance, there was enough evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20812 - 2005-12-27
and Basting’s trial testimony is de minimis. Under either circumstance, there was enough evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20812 - 2005-12-27