Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17911 - 17920 of 29942 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the application of facts to the legal standard is reviewed de novo by this court. See Koenig v. Pierce Cty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175078 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for de novo review. See Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisers LLC, 2014 WI 86, ¶17, 356 Wis. 2d 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210088 - 2018-03-22

[PDF] Atlas Transit, Inc. v. Spence Korte
by a court de novo.” Woznicki, 202 Wis. 2d at 192. ¶10 The bus companies claim that MPS failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3523 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ralph Schmidt v. Northern States Power Company
this action. We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26597 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶¶38-39. We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780839 - 2024-03-26

[PDF] WI App 46
a grant of summary judgment de novo. Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI 137, ¶40, 330 Wis. 2d 389, 793 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244256 - 2019-09-17

E. C. Styberg Engineering Company, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
is inappropriate and in favor of de novo review: Honthaners Rests., Inc. v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 273, 240 Wis. 2d 234
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7464 - 2009-11-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo on appeal. Smith v. Goshaw, 2019 WI App 23, ¶9, 387 Wis. 2d 620, 928 N.W.2d 619
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743224 - 2023-12-21

[PDF] NOTICE
properly awarded damages. Grafft asserts our review is de novo, because it involves the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29680 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
(1995)). Whether such a duty exists is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Coffey v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16386 - 2017-09-21