Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17921 - 17930 of 29848 for des.

[PDF] Textron Financial Corporation v. Firstar Bank Wisconsin
for summary judgment de novo, and employ the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12713 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
under the implied consent law, Wis. Stat. § 343.305, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06

Loretta M. Gilmeister v. Eugene Zdroik & Sons, Inc.
. § 803.09(1) is a question of law, and we review questions of law de novo. State ex rel. Bilder v. Township
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lee Raven
. ¶7 The sufficiency of a complaint is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15650 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
review the claim de novo. See State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d 506, 508, 588 N.W.2d 89 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50138 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
and the application of a statute are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Wagner Mobile, Inc. v. City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16947 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith M. Carey
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6586 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard W. Foelker
. The application of the implied consent law to an undisputed set of facts is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9540 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
facts de novo. State v. 3 A third circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204950 - 2017-12-13

Robert Potratz v. Stokely Usa, Inc.
court and decide de novo whether summary judgment is appropriate. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9282 - 2005-03-31