Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17921 - 17930 of 59464 for quit claim deed.
Search results 17921 - 17930 of 59464 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
analysis that there would be no arguable merit to a claim relating to statutory deadlines. Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
analysis that there would be no arguable merit to a claim relating to statutory deadlines. Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
Bockhorst v. David B. Kalan
of contract damages, interest and attorney fees pursuant to § 814.025, STATS. Kalan claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8435 - 2017-09-19
of contract damages, interest and attorney fees pursuant to § 814.025, STATS. Kalan claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8435 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the mistaken belief that a prior small claims case had been dismissed with prejudice. We reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160012 - 2017-09-21
on the mistaken belief that a prior small claims case had been dismissed with prejudice. We reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160012 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
Carrie S.’s parental rights, and (3) whether the record supports any claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106830 - 2014-01-21
Carrie S.’s parental rights, and (3) whether the record supports any claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106830 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2006 earlier denial of a Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06)[1] postconviction order.[2] Rones claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29110 - 2007-07-23
, 2006 earlier denial of a Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06)[1] postconviction order.[2] Rones claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29110 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
’ imprisonment and twenty years’ probation. In 2003, Prude filed a pro se motion claiming that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2013-12-09
’ imprisonment and twenty years’ probation. In 2003, Prude filed a pro se motion claiming that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105382 - 2013-12-09
State v. Michael D. Singleton
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rejected the claim as an untimely effort to challenge the exercise of sentencing discretion. Lindsey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19
rejected the claim as an untimely effort to challenge the exercise of sentencing discretion. Lindsey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw his guilty plea. He claims he has newly discovered evidence that his case was not brought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186406 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw his guilty plea. He claims he has newly discovered evidence that his case was not brought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186406 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and claimed that the driver was inside the gas station purchasing some beer. However, no other drivers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30473 - 2007-10-02
and claimed that the driver was inside the gas station purchasing some beer. However, no other drivers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30473 - 2007-10-02