Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17931 - 17940 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5544 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas J. Otto v. Milwaukee County
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting promissory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19

Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v. Wille, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81532 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Lisa L. Lappley
is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19776 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in a criminal prosecution is a question of law” which this court reviews de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612601 - 2023-01-24

2010 WI APP 67
. Stat. Rule 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings on summary judgment, and apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49357 - 2011-08-21

Joseph P. Krause v. Myre Electric, Inc.
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2118 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a settlement agreement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13