Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17941 - 17950 of 29713 for des.
Search results 17941 - 17950 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Cody J. Vandenberg
different judges, a motion for a new trial is subject to de novo review on appeal. State v. Herfel, 49
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
different judges, a motion for a new trial is subject to de novo review on appeal. State v. Herfel, 49
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rudolph L. Jackson
violated the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. Williams, 249 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20
violated the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. Williams, 249 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
material facts is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶9. If the motion does not raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669688 - 2023-06-20
material facts is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶9. If the motion does not raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669688 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Kirk L. Griese
the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶9 The circuit court concluded that there was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20532 - 2017-09-21
the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶9 The circuit court concluded that there was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20532 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence.” Id. “Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
sentence.” Id. “Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to the State to show that the error was harmless. Id., ¶3. We review de novo the constitutional issue whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
to the State to show that the error was harmless. Id., ¶3. We review de novo the constitutional issue whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95802 - 2013-04-22
, 274 Wis. 2d at 576, 682 N.W.2d at 437. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95802 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
L. W. Meyer, Inc. v. Robert Koeferl
which this court reviews de novo. Kaun v. Indus. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 667, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4693 - 2017-09-19
which this court reviews de novo. Kaun v. Indus. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 667, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4693 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable and that any delay of the notice of intent was acceptably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32921 - 2008-06-10
on Wartman’s proposal was de minimus and remediable and that any delay of the notice of intent was acceptably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32921 - 2008-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
County: linda van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Snyder and Neubauer, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34875 - 2008-12-16
County: linda van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Snyder and Neubauer, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34875 - 2008-12-16