Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17941 - 17950 of 76901 for see.
Search results 17941 - 17950 of 76901 for see.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
could withdraw his pleas. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118947 - 2014-09-15
could withdraw his pleas. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard Moder
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3595 - 2017-09-19
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3595 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Laurie Ann (Lund) Bigalke v. Ricky James Lund
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16194 - 2017-09-21
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16194 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Banks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157088 - 2017-09-21
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Banks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP3-CRNM 2 appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723950 - 2023-11-07
. No. 2022AP3-CRNM 2 appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723950 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717186 - 2023-10-25
there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717186 - 2023-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Michael Storzer
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
discloses no manifest injustice upon which Jump could withdraw his no contest plea. See State v. Duychak
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12
discloses no manifest injustice upon which Jump could withdraw his no contest plea. See State v. Duychak
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. ยง 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138428 - 2015-03-25
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. ยง 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138428 - 2015-03-25
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we summarily reverse. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132598 - 2015-01-12
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we summarily reverse. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132598 - 2015-01-12