Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17951 - 17960 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17951 - 17960 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742123 - 2023-12-19
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742123 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Derwin D. Jones
of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Melton appealed that decision to the circuit court and received a record review (rather than a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752898 - 2024-01-24
. Melton appealed that decision to the circuit court and received a record review (rather than a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752898 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to findings of fact is a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208082 - 2018-02-06
to findings of fact is a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208082 - 2018-02-06
State v. Sean Smith
constitutional muster is a question of law which we review de novo. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11973 - 2005-03-31
constitutional muster is a question of law which we review de novo. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11973 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tommy Smith, Jr.
of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5651 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we consider de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5651 - 2005-03-31
Corey J. Hampton v. David H. Schwarz
is accomplished by a writ of certiorari to the circuit court, see id., and is not subject to de novo review, Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31
is accomplished by a writ of certiorari to the circuit court, see id., and is not subject to de novo review, Van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
relationships were, in context, de minimis and proper. At sentencing, the trial court first considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
relationships were, in context, de minimis and proper. At sentencing, the trial court first considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
Christopher J. Keller v. James R. Kraft
to suits between co-employees. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Stephenson v. Universal Metrics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5995 - 2005-03-31
to suits between co-employees. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Stephenson v. Universal Metrics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution under a certain set of facts [as] a question of law that we review de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095820 - 2026-03-26
to order restitution under a certain set of facts [as] a question of law that we review de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095820 - 2026-03-26