Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17951 - 17960 of 64205 for records.
Search results 17951 - 17960 of 64205 for records.
Adalbert Menzer v. Theron A. Nair
. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The record is not entirely clear on this point, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9160 - 2005-03-31
. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The record is not entirely clear on this point, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235153 - 2019-02-20
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235153 - 2019-02-20
State v. George D. Thomas
that Thomas had never held a full-time permanent job, that he had a substantial felony record, that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3172 - 2005-03-31
that Thomas had never held a full-time permanent job, that he had a substantial felony record, that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392919 - 2021-07-15
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392919 - 2021-07-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595453 - 2022-11-29
independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595453 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756532 - 2024-01-30
to the no-merit report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756532 - 2024-01-30
CA Blank Order
, the supplemental no-merit report counsel was ordered to file, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103800 - 2013-11-05
, the supplemental no-merit report counsel was ordered to file, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103800 - 2013-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602633 - 2022-12-20
considering the no-merit report and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602633 - 2022-12-20
[PDF]
Jane L. Boltz v. Keith W. Boltz
. No. 02-1062-FT 2 After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the record, we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5178 - 2017-09-19
. No. 02-1062-FT 2 After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the record, we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004236 - 2025-09-03
reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004236 - 2025-09-03