Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17961 - 17970 of 84000 for case search.
Search results 17961 - 17970 of 84000 for case search.
State v. Thomas A. Greve
N.W.2d 780 (Ct. App. 1992), establishes a bright-line rule that before a case can be returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3995 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 780 (Ct. App. 1992), establishes a bright-line rule that before a case can be returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Greve
, 257-58, 490 N.W.2d 780 (Ct. App. 1992), establishes a bright-line rule that before a case can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3995 - 2017-09-20
, 257-58, 490 N.W.2d 780 (Ct. App. 1992), establishes a bright-line rule that before a case can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3995 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Mary Herr v. Rodolph J. Lanaghan
2006 WI APP 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP422
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21580 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP422
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Guide to the Judicial Workload Study
. The model estimates the amount of judicial time required to process cases and translates that work
/courts/supreme/docs/judworkloadstudy.pdf - 2026-05-20
. The model estimates the amount of judicial time required to process cases and translates that work
/courts/supreme/docs/judworkloadstudy.pdf - 2026-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, Graham Case. Zaleski requested review of the administrative warning, and the Board affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145377 - 2015-07-29
, Graham Case. Zaleski requested review of the administrative warning, and the Board affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145377 - 2015-07-29
City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
). This is the second time we have considered this case. We previously vacated the circuit court’s order affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31
). This is the second time we have considered this case. We previously vacated the circuit court’s order affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
sentence for the offense.2 We agree and reverse the judgment. The appeal concerns three separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13391 - 2017-09-21
sentence for the offense.2 We agree and reverse the judgment. The appeal concerns three separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13391 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 138
2007 WI 138 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP806-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31169 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI 138 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP806-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31169 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
2007 WI 138 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP806-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31169 - 2007-12-10
2007 WI 138 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP806-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31169 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2020 WI 11 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP1129 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253726 - 2020-02-14
2020 WI 11 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP1129 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253726 - 2020-02-14