Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17961 - 17970 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17961 - 17970 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
(Ct. App. 1996). We will likewise determine questions of statutory construction de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1996). We will likewise determine questions of statutory construction de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10752 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901374 - 2025-01-16
they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901374 - 2025-01-16
State v. Marshall R. Reese
apparent exculpatory value when it was destroyed was de minimis at best. Although, as we have seen, Reese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
apparent exculpatory value when it was destroyed was de minimis at best. Although, as we have seen, Reese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Jackson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15467 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis. 2d 357, 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason J.C.
its own records. The scope of a court’s inherent power is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12425 - 2017-09-21
its own records. The scope of a court’s inherent power is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Sarnowski, Jr.
). Whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10478 - 2017-09-20
). Whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10478 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43579 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43579 - 2014-09-15
Mary Klauser v. Robert Schmitz
” present questions of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. First Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
” present questions of law we review de novo. See State ex rel. First Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s finding of fact regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31
that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s finding of fact regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence satisfies the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072857 - 2026-02-03
the evidence satisfies the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072857 - 2026-02-03