Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17961 - 17970 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 17961 - 17970 of 65155 for or b.
[PDF]
State v. Derwin D. Jones
transmitted disease and (b) a fellow jail inmate about his motive to testify in favor of the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
transmitted disease and (b) a fellow jail inmate about his motive to testify in favor of the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
testing is ordered at the discretion of the court, set forth in § 974.07(7)(b). Robinson asserts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27
testing is ordered at the discretion of the court, set forth in § 974.07(7)(b). Robinson asserts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27
State v. Derwin D. Jones
(a) the victim about a sexually transmitted disease and (b) a fellow jail inmate about his motive to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3588 - 2005-03-31
(a) the victim about a sexually transmitted disease and (b) a fellow jail inmate about his motive to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
testing is ordered at the discretion of the court, set forth in § 974.07(7)(b). Robinson asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27
testing is ordered at the discretion of the court, set forth in § 974.07(7)(b). Robinson asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. §§ 941.29(2) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order that denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110343 - 2014-04-14
. Stat. §§ 941.29(2) and 939.62(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order that denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110343 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
State v. John S.
was appropriate. B. Due Process. ¶15 John claims that his basic due process rights were violated when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
was appropriate. B. Due Process. ¶15 John claims that his basic due process rights were violated when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
City of Oshkosh v. John Daggett
THE RESPONDENT WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO APPEAL THIS CASE.” The City counters that Wis. Stat. § 893.93(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20856 - 2006-01-10
THE RESPONDENT WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO APPEAL THIS CASE.” The City counters that Wis. Stat. § 893.93(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20856 - 2006-01-10
State v. Deondre J. Kelley
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Paul B. Higginbotham and James L. Martin, Judges.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7420 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Paul B. Higginbotham and James L. Martin, Judges.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7420 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deondre J. Kelley
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Paul B. Higginbotham and James L. Martin, Judges.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7424 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Paul B. Higginbotham and James L. Martin, Judges.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7424 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Torpen
. § 973.09 also addresses restitution. Wisconsin Stat. § 973.09(1)(b) states that the court “shall order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
. § 973.09 also addresses restitution. Wisconsin Stat. § 973.09(1)(b) states that the court “shall order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31