Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17971 - 17980 of 27272 for ads.
Search results 17971 - 17980 of 27272 for ads.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was thirty-five years of imprisonment, determined by adding fifteen years to the maximum twenty-year prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97974 - 2014-09-15
was thirty-five years of imprisonment, determined by adding fifteen years to the maximum twenty-year prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97974 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Claudia M. Bourassa v. Hallmark Group Realtors
… not been terminated. (Emphasis added.) This court must determine whether Hallmark may withhold half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14740 - 2017-09-21
… not been terminated. (Emphasis added.) This court must determine whether Hallmark may withhold half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Surles argues that “[h]ad counsel informed Surles his testimony was necessary to his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875564 - 2024-11-13
.” Surles argues that “[h]ad counsel informed Surles his testimony was necessary to his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875564 - 2024-11-13
State v. Brady T. Terrill
misdemeanors. He was originally charged with only the felony. The misdemeanors were added as part of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
misdemeanors. He was originally charged with only the felony. The misdemeanors were added as part of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” (Emphasis added.) The language of the agreement is clear and unambiguous: Vidic was entitled to a monthly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73888 - 2011-11-14
.” (Emphasis added.) The language of the agreement is clear and unambiguous: Vidic was entitled to a monthly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73888 - 2011-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
Walworth Homes next complains that the Board’s interpretation of the ordinance “has the added problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80969 - 2012-04-17
Walworth Homes next complains that the Board’s interpretation of the ordinance “has the added problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80969 - 2012-04-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There was nothing about the detective’s testimony that added to Gatlin’s defense. No. 2023AP585-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771426 - 2024-03-07
. There was nothing about the detective’s testimony that added to Gatlin’s defense. No. 2023AP585-CRNM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771426 - 2024-03-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the OWI investigation and therefore improperly added time to the stop: (1) joking about a banana peel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859491 - 2024-10-10
to the OWI investigation and therefore improperly added time to the stop: (1) joking about a banana peel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859491 - 2024-10-10
State v. David J. Allain
Waldner. Unlike Waldner, there were very few individual facts adding up to reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7114 - 2005-03-31
Waldner. Unlike Waldner, there were very few individual facts adding up to reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7114 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(ellipses added)). The test is whether a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104296 - 2013-11-12
(ellipses added)). The test is whether a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104296 - 2013-11-12