Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17971 - 17980 of 29832 for des.
Search results 17971 - 17980 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 15, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82390 - 2012-05-14
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82390 - 2012-05-14
The Estate of Jean E. Dorschner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
. ¶3 The court of appeals reviews summary judgment motions de novo. Blazekovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2926 - 2005-03-31
. ¶3 The court of appeals reviews summary judgment motions de novo. Blazekovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2926 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tommy Smith, Jr.
disagree. ¶18 Construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5651 - 2017-09-19
disagree. ¶18 Construction of a statute presents a question of law, which we consider de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5651 - 2017-09-19
Thomas J. Otto v. Milwaukee County
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4213 - 2005-03-31
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4213 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Irene M. Oravecz v. The Medical Protective Co.
review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11956 - 2014-09-15
review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11956 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on the manufacturing charge. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
on the manufacturing charge. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
[PDF]
Amber L. English v. Virgil Woodworth
to object to them now. This court, however, reviews the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15422 - 2017-09-21
to object to them now. This court, however, reviews the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15422 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Beverly Heebsh v. Jenks Home Maintenance
the circuit court applied the correct legal standard presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7506 - 2017-09-20
the circuit court applied the correct legal standard presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7506 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the construction of an insurance contract both present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37243 - 2014-09-15
and the construction of an insurance contract both present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 26
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35941 - 2014-09-15
findings of fact unless they are found to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35941 - 2014-09-15