Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17971 - 17980 of 29713 for des.
Search results 17971 - 17980 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 3
Consumer Act (WCA), WIS. STAT. § 421.401. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35069 - 2014-09-15
Consumer Act (WCA), WIS. STAT. § 421.401. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35069 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Danny C. Eesley
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12672 - 2017-09-21
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12672 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eugene M. Brabender
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9716 - 2005-03-31
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9716 - 2005-03-31
Patricia Lemke-Wojnicki v. Paul & Cindy Kolodziaj
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on the manufacturing charge. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
on the manufacturing charge. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
violated on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26536 - 2017-09-21
violated on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26536 - 2017-09-21
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John B. Young
de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. No. 01-2542 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4402 - 2017-09-19
de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. No. 01-2542 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4402 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Motion for Scheduling Order
unconstitutionally configured districts to be unlawful, with senators holding those seats being merely de facto
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0802motion.pdf - 2023-10-16
unconstitutionally configured districts to be unlawful, with senators holding those seats being merely de facto
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0802motion.pdf - 2023-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Id., ¶25. ¶10 In Sauk County v. S.A.M., the supreme court held that appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12
reviews de novo. Id., ¶25. ¶10 In Sauk County v. S.A.M., the supreme court held that appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12