Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17981 - 17990 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17981 - 17990 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
State v. Ronald G. Fedler
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leroy A. Yench
is a question of law that we review de novo. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d at 269. Therefore, the question we must answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d at 269. Therefore, the question we must answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
Patricia Lemke-Wojnicki v. Paul & Cindy Kolodziaj
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law we review de novo. Osborn 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law we review de novo. Osborn 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 144
to de novo review. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 659, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72535 - 2014-09-15
to de novo review. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 659, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72535 - 2014-09-15
Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. Galina Graser
reconsideration. ¶7 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment motion de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4292 - 2005-03-31
reconsideration. ¶7 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment motion de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4292 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman R.
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5321 - 2005-03-31
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James E. Turner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
conclusions of law and statutory interpretation: great weight, due weight and de novo. Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6564 - 2017-09-19
conclusions of law and statutory interpretation: great weight, due weight and de novo. Great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Anderson
, which we review de novo. State v. Daggett, 2002 WI App 32, ¶7, 250 Wis. 2d 112, 640 N.W.2d 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. State v. Daggett, 2002 WI App 32, ¶7, 250 Wis. 2d 112, 640 N.W.2d 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21