Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17981 - 17990 of 29827 for des.
Search results 17981 - 17990 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
), our review is de novo. No. 98-0746-CR 6 The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
), our review is de novo. No. 98-0746-CR 6 The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
Cindy L. Grothe v. Valley Coatings, Inc.
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2306 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2306 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
award was excessive. We review this question de novo. Trinity Evangelical, 261 Wis. 2d 333, ¶48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36412 - 2009-05-06
award was excessive. We review this question de novo. Trinity Evangelical, 261 Wis. 2d 333, ¶48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36412 - 2009-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the lease is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Prent Corp. v. Martek Holdings, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86700 - 2014-09-15
of the lease is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Prent Corp. v. Martek Holdings, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derwin D. Jones
of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review de novo whether the document provided a sufficient factual basis. See State v. Peralta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466443 - 2021-12-23
, we review de novo whether the document provided a sufficient factual basis. See State v. Peralta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466443 - 2021-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meet the constitutional standard—here, reasonable suspicion—is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755533 - 2024-01-31
meet the constitutional standard—here, reasonable suspicion—is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755533 - 2024-01-31
State v. Stanley Egerson
827, 832 (1987). As such, our review is de novo. See id. However, we value and take particular note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12695 - 2005-03-31
827, 832 (1987). As such, our review is de novo. See id. However, we value and take particular note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12695 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gilbert H. Butzlaff
hearsay exceptions is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 111-12, 490 N.W.2d at 756
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10904 - 2005-03-31
hearsay exceptions is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 111-12, 490 N.W.2d at 756
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10904 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 16
The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Joseph E.G., 2001 WI App 29, ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34903 - 2009-01-27
The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Joseph E.G., 2001 WI App 29, ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34903 - 2009-01-27