Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17981 - 17990 of 49819 for our.
Search results 17981 - 17990 of 49819 for our.
Joseph Conway, Jr. v. Board of the Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
Comm'rs of the City of Madison, 2002 WI App 135, ¶22, 256 Wis. 2d 163, 647 N.W.2d 291. ¶4 Our holding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16488 - 2005-03-31
Comm'rs of the City of Madison, 2002 WI App 135, ¶22, 256 Wis. 2d 163, 647 N.W.2d 291. ¶4 Our holding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16488 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
, support our conclusion that the default replevin judgments on which Community Credit relied for possession
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17336 - 2005-03-31
, support our conclusion that the default replevin judgments on which Community Credit relied for possession
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17336 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
. § 751.06.[1] Our examination of the record leads us to conclude that the real controversy was not fully
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16942 - 2005-03-31
. § 751.06.[1] Our examination of the record leads us to conclude that the real controversy was not fully
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16942 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 440. These findings were affirmed by our supreme court. Id. ¶33 The Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
. at 440. These findings were affirmed by our supreme court. Id. ¶33 The Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
Vera Hutson v. State of Wisconsin Personnel Commission
overtime of one hour per every 5.5 points over the 260 point caseload cap per our union contractual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4553 - 2005-03-31
overtime of one hour per every 5.5 points over the 260 point caseload cap per our union contractual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 20
. ¶23 If the meaning of the statutory language is plain and unambiguous, our inquiry ordinarily ends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632770 - 2023-05-23
. ¶23 If the meaning of the statutory language is plain and unambiguous, our inquiry ordinarily ends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632770 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
WI APP 26
, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273. ¶12 When interpreting a statute, our objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792236 - 2024-06-20
, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273. ¶12 When interpreting a statute, our objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792236 - 2024-06-20
William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
evaluated the propriety of habeas relief by reference to the third requirement alone, because our conclusion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17551 - 2005-03-31
evaluated the propriety of habeas relief by reference to the third requirement alone, because our conclusion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17551 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
facts will be included in the discussion as needed. Discussion ¶10 We reserve our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28312 - 2007-03-05
facts will be included in the discussion as needed. Discussion ¶10 We reserve our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28312 - 2007-03-05
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
N.W.2d 277, 279 n.1 (1996), we may disregard our holding in Zanelli I because the concurrence provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13743 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 277, 279 n.1 (1996), we may disregard our holding in Zanelli I because the concurrence provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13743 - 2005-03-31