Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17991 - 18000 of 28880 for f.
Search results 17991 - 18000 of 28880 for f.
COURT OF APPEALS
.” It then affords further review rights “[i]f the results of the reconsideration meeting are not satisfactory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136900 - 2015-03-10
.” It then affords further review rights “[i]f the results of the reconsideration meeting are not satisfactory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136900 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Northern
required to disclose defendants’ criminal records upon demand, WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(f), the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19
required to disclose defendants’ criminal records upon demand, WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(f), the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19
Wilbert Erickson v. Green Lake County Board of Adjustment
in the circuit court “[i]f necessary for the proper disposition of the matter,” it is clear that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2439 - 2005-03-31
in the circuit court “[i]f necessary for the proper disposition of the matter,” it is clear that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2439 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael L., Jr.
the defendant to make full or partial restitution ... [i]f a crime considered at sentencing resulted in damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
the defendant to make full or partial restitution ... [i]f a crime considered at sentencing resulted in damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, supra, § 3.3(f) at n.352 (less satisfying corroboration where no controlled purchase but informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48173 - 2010-04-05
, supra, § 3.3(f) at n.352 (less satisfying corroboration where no controlled purchase but informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48173 - 2010-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
penalties under [Wis. Stat.] § 346.65(2),” Wideman, 206 Wis. 2d at 94, and specifically held that “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
penalties under [Wis. Stat.] § 346.65(2),” Wideman, 206 Wis. 2d at 94, and specifically held that “[i]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92099 - 2014-09-15
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92099 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lynn G.
]f there is any credible evidence, under any reasonable view, that leads to an inference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6919 - 2017-09-20
]f there is any credible evidence, under any reasonable view, that leads to an inference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6919 - 2017-09-20
State v. Trevor D. Jones
. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999-2000). [2] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2945 - 2005-03-31
. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999-2000). [2] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2945 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a finding of probable cause. Id. at 388-89. “[I]f, when the material previously omitted is inserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238716 - 2019-04-09
a finding of probable cause. Id. at 388-89. “[I]f, when the material previously omitted is inserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238716 - 2019-04-09