Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17991 - 18000 of 58312 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial, alleging the ineffective assistance of postconviction/appellate counsel for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29858 - 2007-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the trial court issued a detailed written opinion 2 concluding that the City’s appraisal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35808 - 2018-03-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to a Pierringer release.2 ¶3 By the time of trial, the remaining plaintiffs were the Shockleys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444379 - 2021-10-21

Frontsheet
testimony at trial. While it is true that the prosecutor made the initial overture to begin the plea
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116774 - 2014-07-09

[PDF] Frontsheet
) his trial counsel formalized the substitution request 17 days after being appointed. ¶3 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191653 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
testimony at trial. While it is true that the prosecutor made the initial overture to begin the plea
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116774 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Gordon Graham v. Linda Gerry
period during which he was unemployed. He challenges the trial court’s determination that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15387 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of conviction. He seeks a new trial based upon his contention that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192920 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of postconviction counsel. The issue is whether the trial court should have decided the merits of his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28985 - 2014-09-15

Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
.; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in instructing the jury by failing to define
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14922 - 2005-03-31