Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 181 - 190 of 45228 for Cost-effective.
Search results 181 - 190 of 45228 for Cost-effective.
[PDF]
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6439 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6439 - 2017-09-19
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6300 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6300 - 2005-03-31
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6439 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6439 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
recommended by the referee. We further direct Attorney Scanlan to pay the costs of the reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33769 - 2008-08-18
recommended by the referee. We further direct Attorney Scanlan to pay the costs of the reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33769 - 2008-08-18
Frontsheet
days and that the costs of the proceeding, which are $4,622.69 as of January 24, 2007, should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31515 - 2008-01-15
days and that the costs of the proceeding, which are $4,622.69 as of January 24, 2007, should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31515 - 2008-01-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the costs of this proceeding, which were $1,192.03 as of No. 2016AP684-D 2 September 19
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183315 - 2017-09-21
the costs of this proceeding, which were $1,192.03 as of No. 2016AP684-D 2 September 19
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183315 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Bannen
should be suspended for a period of three years and that he pay the costs of these proceedings. ΒΆ2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16565 - 2017-09-21
should be suspended for a period of three years and that he pay the costs of these proceedings. ΒΆ2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16565 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was frivolous and filed maliciously but denying an award of actual costs and attorney fees because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
was frivolous and filed maliciously but denying an award of actual costs and attorney fees because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the action against them was frivolous and filed maliciously but denying an award of actual costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31680 - 2014-09-15
that the action against them was frivolous and filed maliciously but denying an award of actual costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31680 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
2015 OWI Guidelines District 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .099 or $150.00 Forf + Costs $175.00 Forf + Costs 6 months
/publications/fees/docs/d8owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .099 or $150.00 Forf + Costs $175.00 Forf + Costs 6 months
/publications/fees/docs/d8owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02