Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 181 - 190 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 181 - 190 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
period, the circuit court granted Ted’s motion and denied Stephanie’s motion, awarding Ted sole custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147243 - 2017-09-21
period, the circuit court granted Ted’s motion and denied Stephanie’s motion, awarding Ted sole custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147243 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas G. Kruk v. Judith L. Kruk
court applied the wrong legal No. 00-1771 2 standard when it ordered joint custody, shared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2758 - 2017-09-19
court applied the wrong legal No. 00-1771 2 standard when it ordered joint custody, shared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2758 - 2017-09-19
Thomas G. Kruk v. Judith L. Kruk
it ordered joint custody, shared placement of the children and, further, that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2758 - 2005-03-31
it ordered joint custody, shared placement of the children and, further, that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2758 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Azariah was a child in need of protection or services and denying her motion for sole legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31274 - 2014-09-15
that Azariah was a child in need of protection or services and denying her motion for sole legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31274 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that neither joint legal custody nor sole custody by Jayme was appropriate, the trial court also found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31274 - 2007-12-26
that neither joint legal custody nor sole custody by Jayme was appropriate, the trial court also found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31274 - 2007-12-26
[PDF]
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
settlement agreement incorporated into their divorce judgment, the parties were awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
settlement agreement incorporated into their divorce judgment, the parties were awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
, the parties were awarded joint legal custody of their six minor children. Tanner had primary placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31
, the parties were awarded joint legal custody of their six minor children. Tanner had primary placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
nonetheless ordered joint custody and a shared 8/6 placement. ¶28 Sarah filed a motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165863 - 2017-09-21
nonetheless ordered joint custody and a shared 8/6 placement. ¶28 Sarah filed a motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165863 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
amending the Judgment entered in this action awarding joint custody to Corinne and Douglas, as that term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2428 - 2017-09-19
amending the Judgment entered in this action awarding joint custody to Corinne and Douglas, as that term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2428 - 2017-09-19
Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
the Judgment entered in this action awarding joint custody to Corinne and Douglas, as that term is defined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31
the Judgment entered in this action awarding joint custody to Corinne and Douglas, as that term is defined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31