Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 181 - 190 of 68274 for did.
Search results 181 - 190 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that while Bland may have established standing as a guest, he did not have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718669 - 2023-10-24
conclude that while Bland may have established standing as a guest, he did not have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718669 - 2023-10-24
State v. Rick A. Holtz
the rape examination did not indicate the presence of semen. ¶4 Three other teens testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17826 - 2005-04-26
the rape examination did not indicate the presence of semen. ¶4 Three other teens testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17826 - 2005-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of A.P.’s older children. After their sexual encounter, he did not make any attempts to reach out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
of A.P.’s older children. After their sexual encounter, he did not make any attempts to reach out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
State v. Peter D. Wicker
aluminum-foil packets of heroin in the paper bag. ¶3 Wicker did not live in the house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
aluminum-foil packets of heroin in the paper bag. ¶3 Wicker did not live in the house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of trial counsel because counsel did not argue that his rights under Miranda v. Arizona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33209 - 2008-06-24
ineffective assistance of trial counsel because counsel did not argue that his rights under Miranda v. Arizona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33209 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
advisement. ¶4 D.L. and trial counsel did not appear at the April 5, 2021 permanency plan hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534131 - 2022-06-21
advisement. ¶4 D.L. and trial counsel did not appear at the April 5, 2021 permanency plan hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534131 - 2022-06-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and waiver of rights form with her lawyer and if she understood it. She responded that she did. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45174 - 2009-12-28
and waiver of rights form with her lawyer and if she understood it. She responded that she did. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45174 - 2009-12-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
and waiver of rights form with her lawyer and if she understood it. She responded that she did. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45174 - 2014-09-15
and waiver of rights form with her lawyer and if she understood it. She responded that she did. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45174 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
merchant when he attempted to sell Wright frozen seafood on September 19, 2013. Plaski responded he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130847 - 2014-12-01
merchant when he attempted to sell Wright frozen seafood on September 19, 2013. Plaski responded he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130847 - 2014-12-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responded he did not believe so. The County then asked whether Plaski had an established business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130847 - 2017-09-21
responded he did not believe so. The County then asked whether Plaski had an established business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130847 - 2017-09-21