Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 181 - 190 of 58702 for dos.
Search results 181 - 190 of 58702 for dos.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is the rhetorical line of inquiry in which the prosecutor questioned Mendoza regarding what a “good dad” would do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382131 - 2021-06-29
is the rhetorical line of inquiry in which the prosecutor questioned Mendoza regarding what a “good dad” would do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382131 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Do-It Center in Richland Center. After a fact-intensive five-day bench trial No. 2015AP2542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174612 - 2017-09-21
Do-It Center in Richland Center. After a fact-intensive five-day bench trial No. 2015AP2542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. You know what I mean? Do you wanna tell us what your part in this was, Omar? Smith: I want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101726 - 2017-09-21
. You know what I mean? Do you wanna tell us what your part in this was, Omar? Smith: I want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark W.Q.
2 that the testimony and the evidence do not support the findings of the court. Additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6965 - 2017-09-20
2 that the testimony and the evidence do not support the findings of the court. Additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6965 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mark W.Q.
him into adult court under Wis. Stat. § 938.18. He argues that the testimony and the evidence do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6965 - 2005-03-31
him into adult court under Wis. Stat. § 938.18. He argues that the testimony and the evidence do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Polak
, the trial court must allow the defendant to do so or deprive him or her of the right to represent himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4172 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court must allow the defendant to do so or deprive him or her of the right to represent himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4172 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul L. Polak
and is competent to proceed pro se, the trial court must allow the defendant to do so or deprive him or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
and is competent to proceed pro se, the trial court must allow the defendant to do so or deprive him or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
apply a “highly deferential” standard of review to the circuit court’s findings of fact and do not set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90587 - 2014-09-15
apply a “highly deferential” standard of review to the circuit court’s findings of fact and do not set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90587 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
” standard of review to the circuit court’s findings of fact and do not set aside those findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90587 - 2012-12-12
” standard of review to the circuit court’s findings of fact and do not set aside those findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90587 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Darrin D. Burns
that the defendant was never directly asked in open court "How do you plead?" to the charged offense and that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17196 - 2017-09-21
that the defendant was never directly asked in open court "How do you plead?" to the charged offense and that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17196 - 2017-09-21