Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 181 - 190 of 585 for lip.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
it to Wilson. Page then beat the man he was angry with, busting his nose and lip. King also testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122583 - 2014-09-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
but it “went wrong.” Vargas remembered that he grabbed the woman and she bit him on the lip when he tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69575 - 2014-09-15

State v. James W. Woller
” with her, placing his penis on her lips and tongue. ¶3 On November 26, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20253 - 2005-11-14

[PDF]
. and observed several injuries to A.B., including a bloody lip, bruises on her hands, and red marks around her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24

[PDF] Crystal Lake Cheese Factory v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
a three-inch lip on the threshold that would have to be altered, or a ramp would have to be provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5083 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael S. Piddington
to communicate with his voice and him reading my lips. The officer acknowledged that she was “[n]ot at all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15507 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Piddington
sign. But we were able to communicate with his voice and him reading my lips. The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15507 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
a foundation in reason. Instead, while paying lip service to the deferential standard of review afforded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36827 - 2009-06-16

Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
of the variance criteria was nothing more than a pretext paying what Judge Haese termed “lip service” to Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
concluded that BOZA only paid “lip service” to Judge Lamelas’ order, he nevertheless concluded that Hearst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5003 - 2017-09-19