Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 30072 for de.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 30072 for de.
Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Randy Krueger
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11820 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11820 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce E. Larson v. Sandoval Dental Care
assessment under our responsibility of de novo review. See Kolpin v. Pioneer Power & Light Co., Inc., 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10765 - 2017-09-20
assessment under our responsibility of de novo review. See Kolpin v. Pioneer Power & Light Co., Inc., 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10765 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Charles T. Wagner v. Madison Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120, ¶3, 244 Wis. 2d 280, ___, 628 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3272 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Carroll v. Ansley, 2001 WI App 120, ¶3, 244 Wis. 2d 280, ___, 628 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3272 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this matter, there is no Judgment to reopen. ¶4 Fricano appealed from the municipal court order, seeking de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49797 - 2014-09-15
in this matter, there is no Judgment to reopen. ¶4 Fricano appealed from the municipal court order, seeking de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49797 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Vern Cramer v. Marinette County
if the County’s approval was illegal. Cramer appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5268 - 2017-09-19
if the County’s approval was illegal. Cramer appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5268 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Damon Roundtree
which we review de novo. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 473 N.W.2d 164, 166 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10380 - 2017-09-20
which we review de novo. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 473 N.W.2d 164, 166 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10380 - 2017-09-20
State v. Avery T., Jr.
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
constitute reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review, contrary to what Fowler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30997 - 2007-11-28
constitute reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review, contrary to what Fowler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30997 - 2007-11-28
Jesus Barbary v. James R. Sturm
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review. Id. at 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review. Id. at 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10989 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21