Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 29848 for des.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 29848 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991).[2] ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59738 - 2011-02-07
we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991).[2] ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59738 - 2011-02-07
v. Jane Peckham
. A court commissioner granted the summary judgment motion, and Peckham sought a trial de novo under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11029 - 2005-03-31
. A court commissioner granted the summary judgment motion, and Peckham sought a trial de novo under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11029 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.[1] ¶5 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. See Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70333 - 2011-10-09
.[1] ¶5 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. See Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70333 - 2011-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59738 - 2014-09-15
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nancy Leibly v. Ronald P. Leibly
. Ronald did not appear for the hearing. No. 98-2670-FT 3 Ronald filed a motion for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14509 - 2017-09-21
. Ronald did not appear for the hearing. No. 98-2670-FT 3 Ronald filed a motion for de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14509 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
in Frederick’s favor on the remaining motions. On July 22, 1996, Vicki filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
State v. Damon Roundtree
review de novo. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 473 N.W.2d 164, 166 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10380 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 473 N.W.2d 164, 166 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10380 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37744 - 2009-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Peter Edge
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10608 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10608 - 2017-09-20
10AP2672 State v. Matthew M. Gilbert.doc
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶9 Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶9 Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05