Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 17117 for probate/1000.
Search results 1801 - 1810 of 17117 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Kevin and Margaret’s motions and denied Michael’s, assessed the statutory $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143686 - 2017-09-21
Kevin and Margaret’s motions and denied Michael’s, assessed the statutory $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143686 - 2017-09-21
Charlotte A. Bausano v. James J. Bausano
no value to the corporation upon liquidation. The court valued the software at $1000. [9] Charlotte’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2441 - 2005-03-31
no value to the corporation upon liquidation. The court valued the software at $1000. [9] Charlotte’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2441 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wendell L. Gaines
an Alford plea to the charges.[4] On each count, the court imposed $1000 fines and five-year consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7868 - 2005-03-31
an Alford plea to the charges.[4] On each count, the court imposed $1000 fines and five-year consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Michael Russell von Briesen & Roper, S.C. 411 E. Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 1000 Milwaukee, WI 53202
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11
Michael Russell von Briesen & Roper, S.C. 411 E. Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 1000 Milwaukee, WI 53202
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. [2] Warfield also was ordered to pay a $1000 fine on Count 8, the kidnapping charge. The judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
. [2] Warfield also was ordered to pay a $1000 fine on Count 8, the kidnapping charge. The judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
. At the time the trial court imposed those sentences, Cathey had been serving the terms of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
. At the time the trial court imposed those sentences, Cathey had been serving the terms of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
. At the time the trial court imposed those sentences, Cathey had been serving the terms of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13755 - 2014-09-15
. At the time the trial court imposed those sentences, Cathey had been serving the terms of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13755 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steven D. Cathey
serving the terms of probation the court initially imposed for the two offenses. Cathey contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-06-30
serving the terms of probation the court initially imposed for the two offenses. Cathey contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13755 - 2005-06-30
State v. Steven D. Cathey
serving the terms of probation the court initially imposed for the two offenses. Cathey contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-06-30
serving the terms of probation the court initially imposed for the two offenses. Cathey contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-06-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order extending her probation term for ten years and requiring as a condition of probation that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142085 - 2017-09-21
order extending her probation term for ten years and requiring as a condition of probation that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142085 - 2017-09-21