Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18001 - 18010 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] NOTICE
claim was also procedurally barred by Escalona. ¶4 Preliminarily, Parker waived his Batson challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49298 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
a restitution order. He claims the restitution order should have been extinguished when his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14957 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
a restitution order. He claims the restitution order should have been extinguished when his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14958 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
action had been filed.[2] The court rejected Ronald’s claim that he transferred the vehicle to Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08

[PDF] State v. Armond N. Henderson
. No. 2005AP2304 2 Henderson contends the trial court erred in ruling that his claims were procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26419 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion without a hearing if the defendant’s claim is procedurally barred. See State v. Romero
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717850 - 2023-10-24

State v. Armond N. Henderson
contends the trial court erred in ruling that his claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26419 - 2006-09-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the divorce action had been filed.2 The court rejected Ronald’s claim that he transferred the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73299 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] John Louis Castellani v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company (WILMIC)
a No. 99-1939 2 judgment dismissing an attorney malpractice claim against Michael F. Dubis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15779 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment claim because he failed to object during the trial. Id., ¶23. On review, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16