Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18001 - 18010 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18001 - 18010 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
conclusion, should be subject to de novo review.” Citing State v. Johnson, 177 Wis. 2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
State v. Travis Allen
review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06
review those determinations de novo. See id. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
Re/Max Realty 100 v. Howard Basso, Jr.
132. The construction of a written contract is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5732 - 2017-09-19
132. The construction of a written contract is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 61
interpretation de novo. State v. Williams, 2014 WI 64, ¶16, 355 Wis. 2d 581, 852 N.W.2d 467. ¶14 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194977 - 2017-10-09
interpretation de novo. State v. Williams, 2014 WI 64, ¶16, 355 Wis. 2d 581, 852 N.W.2d 467. ¶14 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194977 - 2017-10-09
[PDF]
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
), our review is de novo. No. 98-0746-CR 6 The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
), our review is de novo. No. 98-0746-CR 6 The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
Cindy L. Grothe v. Valley Coatings, Inc.
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2306 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2306 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
award was excessive. We review this question de novo. Trinity Evangelical, 261 Wis. 2d 333, ¶48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36412 - 2009-05-06
award was excessive. We review this question de novo. Trinity Evangelical, 261 Wis. 2d 333, ¶48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36412 - 2009-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the lease is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Prent Corp. v. Martek Holdings, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86700 - 2014-09-15
of the lease is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Prent Corp. v. Martek Holdings, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derwin D. Jones
of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
of a lesser-included offense is a question of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3588 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review de novo whether the document provided a sufficient factual basis. See State v. Peralta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466443 - 2021-12-23
, we review de novo whether the document provided a sufficient factual basis. See State v. Peralta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466443 - 2021-12-23