Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18011 - 18020 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
Search results 18011 - 18020 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
). The ultimate conclusion of whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133045 - 2015-01-20
). The ultimate conclusion of whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133045 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
Elizabeth Wilson v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
judgment motions de novo, applying the same methodology used in the trial court. Jankee v. Clark County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2149 - 2017-09-19
judgment motions de novo, applying the same methodology used in the trial court. Jankee v. Clark County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2149 - 2017-09-19
Douglas W. Olen v. Frank K. Phelps
by the trial court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. See First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7738 - 2005-03-31
by the trial court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. See First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7738 - 2005-03-31
Kennneth W. Dicks v. Employe Trust Funds Board
Wis.2d 35, 40, 449 N.W.2d 268, 270 (1990). We review the agency's decision de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9214 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 35, 40, 449 N.W.2d 268, 270 (1990). We review the agency's decision de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9214 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102929 - 2013-10-14
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102929 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
WI 90
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38150 - 2014-09-15
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leroy A. Yench
). Whether a suspect’s request for an additional test was sufficient is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
). Whether a suspect’s request for an additional test was sufficient is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
Ronald E. Wilke v. City of Appleton
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. McKenzie, 151 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8508 - 2005-03-31
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. McKenzie, 151 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8508 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith M. Carey
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6582 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737100 - 2023-12-05
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737100 - 2023-12-05