Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18011 - 18020 of 29817 for des.
Search results 18011 - 18020 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Roosevelt Manuel
for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Fischer, 147 Wis.2d 694, 702, 433 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
for a Franks hearing is subject to de novo review. See State v. Fischer, 147 Wis.2d 694, 702, 433 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff, v. G-Skaat, LLC, The De Pere Grand, LLC, Chad M. Schampers, Casey L. Ladowski, Frank R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75402 - 2011-12-19
Plaintiff, v. G-Skaat, LLC, The De Pere Grand, LLC, Chad M. Schampers, Casey L. Ladowski, Frank R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75402 - 2011-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was harmless. Id. Whether a defendant has been denied due process is a constitutional issue we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
was harmless. Id. Whether a defendant has been denied due process is a constitutional issue we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
State v. Todd Fugate
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly, we need not address both Strickland prongs if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5965 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. at 128. Lastly, we need not address both Strickland prongs if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5965 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
State v. Brian Swift
a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31
a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Vogel
of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88606 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Rudolph L. Jackson
violated the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. Williams, 249 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20
violated the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. Williams, 249 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20