Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18021 - 18030 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18021 - 18030 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
and plea attorneys because they incorrectly advised him that he had no speedy trial claims and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10141 - 2017-09-19
and plea attorneys because they incorrectly advised him that he had no speedy trial claims and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10141 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Martin
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Martin claims that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11120 - 2017-09-19
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Martin claims that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11120 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concluded that Cross’s claim of innocence was “not a credible claim” because he had made “statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752325 - 2024-01-24
concluded that Cross’s claim of innocence was “not a credible claim” because he had made “statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752325 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
and plea attorneys because they incorrectly advised him that he had no speedy trial claims and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
and plea attorneys because they incorrectly advised him that he had no speedy trial claims and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
as authority Wis. Stat. § 973.19 (2005-06). [1] He claimed that the circuit court failed to order a competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
as authority Wis. Stat. § 973.19 (2005-06). [1] He claimed that the circuit court failed to order a competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
CA Blank Order
for not previously raising these claims.[2] The postconviction court rejected Burns’ arguments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
for not previously raising these claims.[2] The postconviction court rejected Burns’ arguments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appellate counsel should have raised claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683350 - 2023-07-27
appellate counsel should have raised claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683350 - 2023-07-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
restitution claim. After hearing the victim’s testimony, the circuit court awarded $1400 in restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92723 - 2014-09-15
restitution claim. After hearing the victim’s testimony, the circuit court awarded $1400 in restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92723 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Both said that Green told them Wallstreet committed the crimes. This claim is procedurally barred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213728 - 2018-05-31
. Both said that Green told them Wallstreet committed the crimes. This claim is procedurally barred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213728 - 2018-05-31
State v. Edward C. Brandau
that he had no speedy trial claims and failed to file motions alleging a violation of his speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
that he had no speedy trial claims and failed to file motions alleging a violation of his speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31