Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18031 - 18040 of 29821 for des.
Search results 18031 - 18040 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kennneth W. Dicks v. Employe Trust Funds Board
review the agency's decision de novo and without deference to the view of the certiorari court. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9214 - 2017-09-19
review the agency's decision de novo and without deference to the view of the certiorari court. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9214 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. See County of Jefferson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35613 - 2009-02-18
and review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. See County of Jefferson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35613 - 2009-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
those facts satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
those facts satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29452 - 2007-06-20
State v. Edward E.Tolliver
essentially undisputed facts form the basis for a constitutional investigative stop is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12347 - 2005-03-31
essentially undisputed facts form the basis for a constitutional investigative stop is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
the circumstances, and any error was de minimus. See Ziegler v. Wonn, 18 Wis.2d 382, 389, 118 N.W.2d 706, 710
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
the circumstances, and any error was de minimus. See Ziegler v. Wonn, 18 Wis.2d 382, 389, 118 N.W.2d 706, 710
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13175 - 2017-09-21
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual determinations unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99999 - 2017-09-21
). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual determinations unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282446 - 2020-08-27
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282446 - 2020-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17536 - 2017-09-21
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d 701, 715-16, 345 N.W.2d 457
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17536 - 2017-09-21