Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18031 - 18040 of 58328 for speedy trial.
Search results 18031 - 18040 of 58328 for speedy trial.
State v. Scott J. Bogdala
, and that they were never going to be the same. ¶5 Bogdala argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
, and that they were never going to be the same. ¶5 Bogdala argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel because his trial counsel promised him that he would receive a five- year term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251956 - 2020-01-03
assistance of counsel because his trial counsel promised him that he would receive a five- year term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251956 - 2020-01-03
State v. Billy J. Rachal
the trial erroneously excluded certain testimony, and whether the court imposed an excessive sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3029 - 2005-03-31
the trial erroneously excluded certain testimony, and whether the court imposed an excessive sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3029 - 2005-03-31
John Moilanen v. Robert Nippoldt
and that the entry of an $800 judgment was error. Because this court concludes that the trial court could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10788 - 2005-03-31
and that the entry of an $800 judgment was error. Because this court concludes that the trial court could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10788 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger A. McGinnis
addresses the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial court's exclusion of evidence offered for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9887 - 2017-09-19
addresses the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial court's exclusion of evidence offered for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9887 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Justin W. Smith
a judgment convicting him of sexually assaulting a six-year-old boy. He argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12728 - 2017-09-21
a judgment convicting him of sexually assaulting a six-year-old boy. He argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12728 - 2017-09-21
State v. David A. Bork
by telephone. Bork argues that the trial court violated his right to a public trial and denied him access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4035 - 2005-03-31
by telephone. Bork argues that the trial court violated his right to a public trial and denied him access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Charles O. Schrauth v. Thomas G. Peterson
and affirm the judgment of the trial court. In May 1995, Peterson and Schrauth purchased a home together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12258 - 2017-09-21
and affirm the judgment of the trial court. In May 1995, Peterson and Schrauth purchased a home together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12258 - 2017-09-21
Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. John J. Deluhery
from the trial court's judgment granting declaratory judgment in favor of Hawkeye-Security Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9663 - 2005-03-31
from the trial court's judgment granting declaratory judgment in favor of Hawkeye-Security Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9663 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel prior to his 2007 conviction. We therefore uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100936 - 2013-08-20
, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel prior to his 2007 conviction. We therefore uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100936 - 2013-08-20