Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18041 - 18050 of 68274 for did.

[PDF] State v. James L.C.
, that deficient performance did not prejudice appellant. We agree and affirm the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8112 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
she did not want to change her clothes. ¶5 At the conclusion of the trial, the jury found Mendoza
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382131 - 2021-06-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
examiner who did not conduct the autopsy on the homicide victim testified as No. 2018AP2223-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251187 - 2019-12-09

[PDF] Maurices Incorporated v. Emperor's Kitchen, Inc.
, but he did not do so. ¶4 Before reaching the merits, we must address our standard of review, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15685 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Waupaca County v. Terry L. Winters
of the trial, Waupaca County did not introduce its witnesses to the jury. The court did not ask either party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20553 - 2017-09-21

WI App 7 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP36-CR Complete Title of...
was seated.” She did, however, see the van make “two distinct rocking motions, north and south.” She told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74759 - 2012-01-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
discretion in entering the judgment because it did not make the appropriate findings as required by WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379743 - 2021-06-22

[PDF] State v. Joseph P. DeFilippo
subsequently filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, arguing that he did not adequately waive his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19197 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mark Miller v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
for the Association. The City did not set up teams or arrange schedules for the Association, nor did it provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5375 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
earned from moonlighting at an unaffiliated clinic. Vidic contends the contract was ambiguous and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73888 - 2011-11-14