Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18051 - 18060 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 18051 - 18060 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Isiah Washington
with the no merit report that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court misused its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2009-04-06
with the no merit report that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court misused its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12486 - 2009-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his pleas. We also concluded that postconviction counsel’s decision not to raise a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110284 - 2017-09-21
his pleas. We also concluded that postconviction counsel’s decision not to raise a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1918 2 responded to the no-merit report, raising multiple arguments, including a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
. No. 2023AP1918 2 responded to the no-merit report, raising multiple arguments, including a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
Phyllis M. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
might have been caused by Dr. McEnany's negligence.[2] Mrs. Landis claims she discovered this alleged
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16353 - 2005-03-31
might have been caused by Dr. McEnany's negligence.[2] Mrs. Landis claims she discovered this alleged
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Phyllis M. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
. 2 Mrs. Landis claims she discovered this alleged negligence in February 1999, about one month
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16353 - 2017-09-21
. 2 Mrs. Landis claims she discovered this alleged negligence in February 1999, about one month
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16353 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and counterclaimed, alleging that they had a prescriptive right of use of the disputed property. They also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56782 - 2010-11-16
and counterclaimed, alleging that they had a prescriptive right of use of the disputed property. They also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56782 - 2010-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Davinne G. Taylor
being involved. He claims that his lawyer: 1) should have objected when the State asked Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3872 - 2017-09-20
being involved. He claims that his lawyer: 1) should have objected when the State asked Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3872 - 2017-09-20
Michael Martin Burds v. Kathy Ann Walsh-Burds
the property division. She claims that the trial court erred by not excluding from the property division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10892 - 2005-03-31
the property division. She claims that the trial court erred by not excluding from the property division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10892 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey D. Knickmeier v. James E. Reinke
did so, the circuit court issued a second order. In that order, the court denied Knickmeier’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26006 - 2006-07-26
did so, the circuit court issued a second order. In that order, the court denied Knickmeier’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26006 - 2006-07-26
[PDF]
Mary F. Champine v. Milwaukee County
2 ¶1 KESSLER, J. This appeal involves claims by a class (“Class”) of current and former non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7531 - 2017-09-19
2 ¶1 KESSLER, J. This appeal involves claims by a class (“Class”) of current and former non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7531 - 2017-09-19