Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18051 - 18060 of 64987 for or b.
Search results 18051 - 18060 of 64987 for or b.
State v. Conrad Hagenkord
the underlying bases for his ultimate opinion. B. Insufficient Evidence. Hagenkord next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12256 - 2005-03-31
the underlying bases for his ultimate opinion. B. Insufficient Evidence. Hagenkord next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12256 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger M. Spencer
)(a) and for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) in violation of § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2483 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) in violation of § 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2483 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT III State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gregg B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
OF APPEALS DISTRICT III State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gregg B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
CA Blank Order
at sentencing under Wis. Stat. § 973.049(2). See Wis. Stat. §§ 941.39(1), 939.62(1)(b). Thomas disputed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145379 - 2015-07-27
at sentencing under Wis. Stat. § 973.049(2). See Wis. Stat. §§ 941.39(1), 939.62(1)(b). Thomas disputed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145379 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
State v. John S.
was appropriate. B. Due Process. ¶15 John claims that his basic due process rights were violated when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
was appropriate. B. Due Process. ¶15 John claims that his basic due process rights were violated when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7369 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. By its terms, the definition of operating in WIS. STAT. § 346.63(3)(b) is not restricted to a running
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463882 - 2021-12-22
. By its terms, the definition of operating in WIS. STAT. § 346.63(3)(b) is not restricted to a running
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463882 - 2021-12-22
State v. Michael J. G.
include “[i]ntentional penile ejaculation,” see § 948.01(5)(b), Stats., 1995-96, the statute applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12753 - 2005-03-31
include “[i]ntentional penile ejaculation,” see § 948.01(5)(b), Stats., 1995-96, the statute applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12753 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derek L. Naff
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). Naff contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). Naff contends that the trial court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5069 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Guy P. Ganta, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ray A. Peterson d/b/a Master Builders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
Guy P. Ganta, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ray A. Peterson d/b/a Master Builders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
O’Donnell, Steven B. Casperson, Stephen M. Puckett, Sam Schneiter, Timothy Douma, Lynda J. Schwandt, John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72472 - 2011-10-19
O’Donnell, Steven B. Casperson, Stephen M. Puckett, Sam Schneiter, Timothy Douma, Lynda J. Schwandt, John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72472 - 2011-10-19