Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18061 - 18070 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
Search results 18061 - 18070 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
2005 WI 147 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP2998-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20066 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 147 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP2998-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20066 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
driver’s license for refusing a chemical test. In each case, the sole issue presented is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070125 - 2026-01-29
driver’s license for refusing a chemical test. In each case, the sole issue presented is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070125 - 2026-01-29
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
2005 WI 147 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP2998-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
2005 WI 147 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP2998-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
[PDF]
Sheboygan County v. John J. V.
of the assistant corporation counsel handling the case for the County. ¶4 The matter was finally concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26576 - 2017-09-21
of the assistant corporation counsel handling the case for the County. ¶4 The matter was finally concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26576 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Susan Holloway
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9686 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9686 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a time at the expense of Waupaca County. In a civil action separate from this criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
for a time at the expense of Waupaca County. In a civil action separate from this criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169272 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to authorities in connection with this case, cooperation with authorities to obtain a more favorable outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25
to authorities in connection with this case, cooperation with authorities to obtain a more favorable outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and independently reviewing the record, we concluded that the case presented “an arguably meritorious claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395050 - 2021-07-21
and independently reviewing the record, we concluded that the case presented “an arguably meritorious claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395050 - 2021-07-21
State v. Susan Holloway
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9686 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9686 - 2005-03-31

