Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18061 - 18070 of 68499 for did.
Search results 18061 - 18070 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
below, the circuit court did not summarily deny Marcelle’s request for substitution of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753851 - 2024-01-24
below, the circuit court did not summarily deny Marcelle’s request for substitution of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753851 - 2024-01-24
State v. James D. Minniecheske
N.W.2d at 853. Minniecheske did not ground his action in any of the statutory mechanisms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14015 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 853. Minniecheske did not ground his action in any of the statutory mechanisms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14015 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
forfeitures exceeding $104,000. ¶3 Mikrut appealed the judgments, arguing that he did not need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6215 - 2017-09-19
forfeitures exceeding $104,000. ¶3 Mikrut appealed the judgments, arguing that he did not need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6215 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
unduly depreciate the seriousness of what [he] did.” The trial court also found that Russell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72328 - 2011-10-17
unduly depreciate the seriousness of what [he] did.” The trial court also found that Russell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72328 - 2011-10-17
[PDF]
Paula R. Becvar v. Charles F. Becvar
and spend significant time with them. Charles also testified that due to hostility, he and Paula did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2990 - 2017-09-19
and spend significant time with them. Charles also testified that due to hostility, he and Paula did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2990 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bryan Lee Hudson
policy; because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9831 - 2017-09-19
policy; because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9831 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
name. Two of the initially charged counts that did not involve Linda were dismissed by the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
name. Two of the initially charged counts that did not involve Linda were dismissed by the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
protections and thus could not constitute disorderly conduct; (2) he did not send a message to another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104910 - 2013-11-26
protections and thus could not constitute disorderly conduct; (2) he did not send a message to another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104910 - 2013-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Minnesota. A.P. did not appear at the termination hearing on June 13, 2018. The circuit court found A.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239268 - 2019-04-18
, Minnesota. A.P. did not appear at the termination hearing on June 13, 2018. The circuit court found A.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239268 - 2019-04-18
State v. Bryan Lee Hudson
of public policy; because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31
of public policy; because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in accepting the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31