Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18061 - 18070 of 49831 for our.
Search results 18061 - 18070 of 49831 for our.
State v. Andre D.W.
of juvenile jurisdiction. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the juvenile court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13343 - 2005-03-31
of juvenile jurisdiction. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the juvenile court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
otherwise noted. No. 2014AP1663-CRNM 2 our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122862 - 2014-10-01
otherwise noted. No. 2014AP1663-CRNM 2 our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122862 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97088 - 2014-09-15
court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97088 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 71
to serve in the county jail. It is inconsistent with the statutes and our precedent to interpret WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146979 - 2017-09-21
to serve in the county jail. It is inconsistent with the statutes and our precedent to interpret WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court erred by denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757351 - 2024-01-30
court erred by denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757351 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
do not affect our analysis. NO. 96-3315 3 storm water runoff from the detention basin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
do not affect our analysis. NO. 96-3315 3 storm water runoff from the detention basin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that consent was voluntary. Id. at 237-38. Our review is of the totality of the circumstances, considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34524 - 2008-11-05
that consent was voluntary. Id. at 237-38. Our review is of the totality of the circumstances, considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34524 - 2008-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
raised directly in our court. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶19, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141598 - 2017-09-21
raised directly in our court. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶19, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141598 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of whom testified. It is not our function to review questions as to weight of testimony and credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30820 - 2007-11-07
of whom testified. It is not our function to review questions as to weight of testimony and credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30820 - 2007-11-07