Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 84315 for case number.

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
to Date Total number of cases resolved by opinion .......................... 7 21 Attorney
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326171 - 2021-01-15

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
to Date Total number of cases resolved by opinion .......................... 8 29 Attorney
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644932 - 2023-04-11

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
to Date Total number of cases resolved by opinion .......................... 7 7 Attorney
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599696 - 2022-12-07

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
number of cases resolved by opinion .......................... 7 44 Attorney disciplinary cases
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667066 - 2023-06-07

[PDF] October 24, 2011
to the case number. After the Supreme Court decides a case, the date of oral argument or date of submission
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72849 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] David R. Myers v. Kimberly A. Myers
support. ¶3 At trial, the court indicated that this case was covered by WIS. STAT. § 767.25(1j
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3019 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
transcripts then I could appeal this case at any time down the road.” Howard enclosed a copy of a letter he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27369 - 2006-12-11

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Bannen
2002 WI 117 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-3055-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16565 - 2017-09-21

State v. Scott R. Nelson
N.W.2d 80. Furthermore, because this case involves a facial challenge to the statute, we do
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21617 - 2006-03-01

[PDF] Supreme Court Rules petition 11-05: Petitioner's letter brief
) or cases interpreting that statute, and (2) whether the supreme court has the authority to adopt proposed
/supreme/docs/1105petitionerbrief.pdf - 2011-11-14