Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 30202 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. David M. Mosel
review de novo, State v. Johnson, 177 Wis.2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d 876, 879 (Ct. App. 1993). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10848 - 2017-09-20
review de novo, State v. Johnson, 177 Wis.2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d 876, 879 (Ct. App. 1993). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10848 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Id., ¶25. ¶10 In Sauk County v. S.A.M., the supreme court held that appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12
reviews de novo. Id., ¶25. ¶10 In Sauk County v. S.A.M., the supreme court held that appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913972 - 2025-02-12
State v. Norman R.
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5323 - 2005-03-31
such grounds, see Wis. Stat. § 48.424, was held as a bench trial. Although we review de novo whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, ¶15, 322 Wis. 2d 265, 778 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95705 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, ¶15, 322 Wis. 2d 265, 778 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95705 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 499, 643 N.W.2d 777. We review de novo whether the application of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168844 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 499, 643 N.W.2d 777. We review de novo whether the application of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168844 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James L. Gratz v. Harold E. Gratz
judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10803 - 2017-09-20
judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10803 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the grant of summary judgment de novo and apply the same standard as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29282 - 2014-09-15
. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the grant of summary judgment de novo and apply the same standard as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29282 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Fowler
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2950 - 2017-09-19
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2950 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
de novo.” State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04