Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Norman O. Brown v. Stephen Puckett
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14555 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary J. Hazen
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2005-03-31
State v. David M. Mosel
a question of law, which we review de novo, State v. Johnson, 177 Wis.2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d 876, 879 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which we review de novo, State v. Johnson, 177 Wis.2d 224, 233, 501 N.W.2d 876, 879 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas J. Otto v. Milwaukee County
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting promissory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶18 Otto’s complaint asserting promissory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4213 - 2017-09-19
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. ¶9 In order to convict a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185894 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. ¶9 In order to convict a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185894 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2021-22).5 “We review de novo [a] grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758905 - 2024-02-06
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2021-22).5 “We review de novo [a] grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758905 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
questions of law that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2731 - 2017-09-19
questions of law that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2731 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal is a legal question that we review de novo. Raflik, 248 Wis. 2d 593, ¶32. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675537 - 2023-07-05
appeal is a legal question that we review de novo. Raflik, 248 Wis. 2d 593, ¶32. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675537 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v. Wille, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81532 - 2014-09-15
review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v. Wille, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81532 - 2014-09-15