Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de novo review. Bartram
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
court’s determination is a legal conclusion and is therefore subject to our de novo review. Bartram
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction is a question of law, which is reviewable de novo. See Dragoo v. Dragoo, 99 Wis. 2d 42, 43, 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45677 - 2010-01-12
jurisdiction is a question of law, which is reviewable de novo. See Dragoo v. Dragoo, 99 Wis. 2d 42, 43, 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45677 - 2010-01-12
2010 WI APP 139
judgments are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
judgments are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
de novo. Abbas v. Palmersheim, 2004 WI App 126, ¶17, 275 Wis. 2d 311, 685 N.W.2d 546. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29268 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Abbas v. Palmersheim, 2004 WI App 126, ¶17, 275 Wis. 2d 311, 685 N.W.2d 546. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29268 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven P. Berth
will decide de novo. See id. at 607, 369 N.W.2d at 725. At the hearing on Berth’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13843 - 2014-09-15
will decide de novo. See id. at 607, 369 N.W.2d at 725. At the hearing on Berth’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
to grant summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13625 - 2017-09-21
to grant summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Virtis A.
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Smith and Spidahl Enterprises, Inc. v. Mark H. Lee
and range. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10610 - 2017-09-20
and range. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10610 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Paulson
, determining de novo whether a constitutional violation has occurred. See State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18026 - 2017-09-21
, determining de novo whether a constitutional violation has occurred. See State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18026 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
. The reviewing court is not required to supply its own factual conclusions through a de novo search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12029 - 2017-09-21
. The reviewing court is not required to supply its own factual conclusions through a de novo search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12029 - 2017-09-21