Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
State v. Michael D. Sarnowski, Jr.
are questions of law, which we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10478 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law, which we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10478 - 2005-03-31
James H. Gold v. City of Adams
are questions of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3912 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3912 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v. Westmoreland, 2008 WI App 15, ¶18, 307 Wis. 2d 429, 744 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95661 - 2013-04-23
was deficient or prejudicial de novo. State v. Westmoreland, 2008 WI App 15, ¶18, 307 Wis. 2d 429, 744 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95661 - 2013-04-23
State v. Claus Bruestle
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7455 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 342, 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7455 - 2005-03-31
Sauk County v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14852 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lamardus D. Ford
, and, if so, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11512 - 2005-03-31
, and, if so, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11512 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
[PDF]
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5544 - 2017-09-19
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5544 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19
, who have already exhausted their direct appeals is an issue of law that we decide de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M. P., 2003 WI App 232, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48124 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M. P., 2003 WI App 232, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48124 - 2014-09-15