Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
County of Dodge v. Michael J.K.
which we review de novo without deference to the trial court's decision. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo without deference to the trial court's decision. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30
State v. Michael Marks
to be free from double jeopardy is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
to be free from double jeopardy is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald G. Fedler
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31
George B. Furey, Jr. v. Clarine A. Furey
hearing on October 29, 2004, the circuit court considered de novo the issues of physical placement, child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21169 - 2006-01-31
hearing on October 29, 2004, the circuit court considered de novo the issues of physical placement, child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21169 - 2006-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07
State v. Leroy A. Yench
is a question of law that we review de novo. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d at 269. Therefore, the question we must answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d at 269. Therefore, the question we must answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
State v. D. Weasler
court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous, but decide the constitutional facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14936 - 2005-03-31
court’s findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous, but decide the constitutional facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14936 - 2005-03-31
Patricia Lemke-Wojnicki v. Paul & Cindy Kolodziaj
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law we review de novo. Osborn 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law we review de novo. Osborn 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21