Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Carole F. Edland v. Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation
interprets a statute under a de novo standard, without deference to the decision of the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17130 - 2017-09-21
interprets a statute under a de novo standard, without deference to the decision of the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17130 - 2017-09-21
Vonnie D. Darby v. Jon Litscher
a question of law subject to our de novo review. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5160 - 2005-03-31
a question of law subject to our de novo review. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5160 - 2005-03-31
William J. Faber v. Josephine W. Musser
reviews under a de novo standard a legislatively created entity's determination of its own statutory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17007 - 2015-01-25
reviews under a de novo standard a legislatively created entity's determination of its own statutory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17007 - 2015-01-25
[PDF]
Global Steel Products Corp. v. Ecklund Carriers, Inc.
. The construction of a statute and its application to undisputed facts are questions of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3903 - 2017-09-20
. The construction of a statute and its application to undisputed facts are questions of law which we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3903 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
State v. John S.
Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7369 - 2005-03-31
Constitutional issues in TPR cases are reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7369 - 2005-03-31
Verlyn A. Schleusner v. William R. Lamb
is a question of law that we review de novo. Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d 439, 454, 471 N.W.2d 522 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2667 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d 439, 454, 471 N.W.2d 522 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2667 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s finding of fact regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2731 - 2005-03-31
that appellate courts review de novo. See id. at ¶18. However, the trial court’s finding of fact regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2731 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Lala, 2009 WI App 137, ¶8, 321 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
review de novo. See Craig S.G. v. State, 209 Wis. 2d 65, 68, 561 N.W.2d 807 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Craig S.G. v. State, 209 Wis. 2d 65, 68, 561 N.W.2d 807 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31