Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 18071 - 18080 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Terrance L. Massey v. Tom Wakely
that because the trial court did not find that Wakely’s allegations were untrue, the injunction No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3621 - 2017-09-19
that because the trial court did not find that Wakely’s allegations were untrue, the injunction No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3621 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131229 - 2014-12-09
trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131229 - 2014-12-09
Elizabeth A. Ryder v. Society Insurance
appeal a pretrial order awarding costs and attorney’s fees to Elizabeth and James Ryder. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
appeal a pretrial order awarding costs and attorney’s fees to Elizabeth and James Ryder. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Henry J. Gefke v. Ruthannes River Centre Cleaner
that the failure to appear constituted excusable neglect and, therefore, the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2598 - 2017-09-19
that the failure to appear constituted excusable neglect and, therefore, the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2598 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel. The issue is whether the trial court should have decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28985 - 2007-06-26
the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel. The issue is whether the trial court should have decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28985 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. Johnson claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28708 - 2007-04-16
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. Johnson claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28708 - 2007-04-16
CA Blank Order
his conviction, judgment and sentence to permit withdrawal of his guilty plea. The trial court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94675 - 2013-04-02
his conviction, judgment and sentence to permit withdrawal of his guilty plea. The trial court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94675 - 2013-04-02
State v. Billy J. Rachal
the trial erroneously excluded certain testimony, and whether the court imposed an excessive sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3029 - 2005-03-31
the trial erroneously excluded certain testimony, and whether the court imposed an excessive sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Norman O. Brown v. Richard Artison
claims the trial court erred in granting Artison’s motion to dismiss. Because the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10872 - 2017-09-20
claims the trial court erred in granting Artison’s motion to dismiss. Because the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10872 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Luke C. Anderson
with a person” without consent. At the plea hearing, after the trial court described the amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20861 - 2017-09-21
with a person” without consent. At the plea hearing, after the trial court described the amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20861 - 2017-09-21