Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18081 - 18090 of 83454 for case code.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Democratic Senator Respondents
, Respondents, FILED 10-30-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response Brief
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefdemsen.pdf - 2023-10-30

Frontsheet
2007 WI 74 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP1189-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29462 - 2007-06-20

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Opening Brief in Support of Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senators Proposed Maps
OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Opening Brief in Support of Wisconsin Legislature and ...Filed
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224openingbriefinsupport.pdf - 2024-01-12

State v. Raphael C. Calhoun
in this case are to remain outside of the courtroom. They are not to discuss any aspect of the case or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2999 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632774 - 2023-03-14

[PDF] WI APP 66
2012 WI APP 66 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP583
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83037 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the recommitment hearing in this case was held on August 28, 2020. Thus, its requirement is applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440123 - 2021-10-12

Certification
. In the present case, the parties’ arguments are focused on applying the current rules to the facts. However
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29496 - 2007-06-27

WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP583 Complete Title of ...
2012 WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP583 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83037 - 2012-06-26

[PDF] State v. Trammel V. Johnson
discretion when it allegedly did not consider “a very harsh sentence” he received in another robbery case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5528 - 2017-09-19