Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18081 - 18090 of 70067 for hi.
Search results 18081 - 18090 of 70067 for hi.
COURT OF APPEALS
modification, because it negated two other counties’ determinations that he was eligible. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
modification, because it negated two other counties’ determinations that he was eligible. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
CA Blank Order
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Gordon Hammer appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145420 - 2015-07-28
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Gordon Hammer appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145420 - 2015-07-28
State v. Eric J. Yelk
demonstrates that Yelk entered his pleas knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. He signed waiver of rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11855 - 2005-03-31
demonstrates that Yelk entered his pleas knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. He signed waiver of rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11855 - 2005-03-31
County of Green Lake v. John T. Welke
was situated in violation of his Fourth Amendment protections. The trial court denied Welke’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16074 - 2005-03-31
was situated in violation of his Fourth Amendment protections. The trial court denied Welke’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leroy K. Kuhnke
offender, contrary to §§ 940.01(1), 939.63 and 939.62, Stats., and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12494 - 2005-03-31
offender, contrary to §§ 940.01(1), 939.63 and 939.62, Stats., and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leroy K. Kuhnke
, STATS., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Kuhnke argues that: (1) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12494 - 2017-09-21
, STATS., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Kuhnke argues that: (1) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12494 - 2017-09-21
Kimberly A. Cashin v. William G. Cashin
him to pay maintenance in an amount equal to 25% of his gross income rather than 25% of his salary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6383 - 2005-03-31
him to pay maintenance in an amount equal to 25% of his gross income rather than 25% of his salary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Zimmerman argues that he is entitled to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Zimmerman argues that he is entitled to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
Gary L. Crawley v. Edward L. Mazola
with Mazola’s and Teeples’s permission. The terms of his living there were disputed, with Crawley claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12452 - 2017-09-21
with Mazola’s and Teeples’s permission. The terms of his living there were disputed, with Crawley claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12452 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary M. B.
to impeach his credibility instead of limiting the number of admissible convictions to his two most recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4708 - 2005-03-31
to impeach his credibility instead of limiting the number of admissible convictions to his two most recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4708 - 2005-03-31