Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18091 - 18100 of 29823 for des.

2010 WI APP 139
judgments are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21

[PDF] NOTICE
de novo. Abbas v. Palmersheim, 2004 WI App 126, ¶17, 275 Wis. 2d 311, 685 N.W.2d 546. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29268 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Steven P. Berth
will decide de novo. See id. at 607, 369 N.W.2d at 725. At the hearing on Berth’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13843 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
to grant summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo. Ottinger v. Pinel, 215 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13625 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Virtis A.
review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Milwaukee Police Association v. Nannette H. Hegerty
of statutory application, which is subject to our de novo review. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7051 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Smith and Spidahl Enterprises, Inc. v. Mark H. Lee
and range. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10610 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kevin L. Paulson
, determining de novo whether a constitutional violation has occurred. See State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18026 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
. The reviewing court is not required to supply its own factual conclusions through a de novo search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12029 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 102
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Tully, 2005 WI 100, ¶25
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75496 - 2014-09-15