Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18091 - 18100 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
review de novo. See Lecander v. Billmeyer, 171 Wis. 2d 593, 602, 492 N.W.2d 167, 171 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16035 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60761 - 2014-09-15

County of Dodge v. Michael J.K.
which we review de novo without deference to the trial court's decision. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
omitted). On appeal, we review the court’s legal decisions de novo but must uphold its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99999 - 2013-07-30

John D. Riley v. Ford Motor Company
of law requiring de novo review. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3222 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael Marks
to be free from double jeopardy is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ronald G. Fedler
by the circuit court is a question of law which we review de novo. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Ansari, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31

State v. William H. Roberts
proved those prior convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31

George B. Furey, Jr. v. Clarine A. Furey
hearing on October 29, 2004, the circuit court considered de novo the issues of physical placement, child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21169 - 2006-01-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123107 - 2014-10-07